Why People Decisions Belong in the Boardroom: A Q&A with Nina Carøe

Many leaders have heard plenty about what AI can do, and far less about what it takes to make it work inside an existing business. Customers still need serving, results still need delivering, and people are trying to understand what all of this means for them. Buying the technology does not settle any of that.

Nina Carøe is Chief Human Success Officer at Zensai, a role she pioneered. Together with Rasmus Holst and Robin Daniels, she co-wrote The Human Success Playbook: A Leadership Tale for the Age of AI (Zensai Media, May 2026), a business fable in which a CEO facing a demanding board has to work out how people, strategy and finance fit together.

In this Q&A, Nina explains why she and her co-authors chose a story over a framework, what the Trifecta of CEO, CFO and people leader is meant to fix, and how a Chief Human Success Officer differs from a traditional head of HR. She also talks about measuring learning and engagement without over-trusting the numbers, why leaders need tools rather than rules, and the one shift she would like to see on Monday morning.

Know a woman leader doing incredible work? The Founded by Women Awards are open for entries. Showcase your story, gain visibility and connect with a community of leaders. 👉 foundedbywomen.org/awards

Q: Tell us about yourself and how the three of you came together to write The Human Success Playbook.

We bring quite different perspectives. My background is in HR and entrepreneurship, Robin’s is in building and scaling businesses, and Rasmus brings the CEO perspective. We came together at Zensai, and Human Success became something we worked on from those different angles.

The book started over coffee one Friday, almost two years ago. We kept coming back to how AI would change businesses and the stories we were hearing from customers and people in our network. Somewhere in that conversation, we decided to write a book.

The storyline changed quite a bit over the next twelve months. AI matured, we had new experiences, and the questions we were asking changed too. For me, that’s what makes the book special. We were in the middle of the change ourselves, writing and learning as we went.

Q: What inspired this book, and what problem were you trying to solve for leaders?

We were hearing a lot about what AI could do, but much less about what it would take to make it work inside an existing business.

As a leader, you still have customers to serve, results to deliver, and people who are trying to understand what all of this means for them. Buying the technology doesn’t resolve those questions.

We wanted to explore that part of the conversation. How do you change the way work happens? What do people need to learn? Where do you invest, and what do you stop doing? Those are difficult decisions, and they don’t belong to the technology team alone.

Q: The book is written as a business fable rather than a traditional how-to. Why tell it as a story?

Because knowing what you should do and doing it under pressure are two very different things.

In the story, the CEO has a board asking for better results, people depending on him, and no clear answer about how to move forward. That gives us a way to explore the ideas with something at stake.

I like that readers can recognize a conversation or a situation they’ve been in. They might agree with a character, get frustrated with them, or think they would have handled it differently. That’s more interesting to me than asking someone to accept a framework.

Q: At the heart of the book is an idea you call “Human Success.” How would you describe it to a CEO hearing the term for the first time?

I’d ask whether their organization is set up to help people deliver what the business needs.

You can hire good people and still make it unnecessarily difficult for them to succeed. Priorities are unclear, decisions take too long, or people don’t have the capabilities or support the work requires.

Human Success is about understanding and improving those conditions. It connects learning, engagement, and performance to what the business is trying to achieve. The point isn’t to run more people programs. It’s to help people contribute effectively and keep developing as the work changes.

Q: You introduce “The Trifecta”: the CEO, CFO, and a Chief Human Success Officer working as one team. What breaks in most companies that makes this necessary?

Too often, the strategy, the financial plan, and the people conversation happen separately. Then we’re surprised when they don’t fit together.

A strategy might depend on capabilities we haven’t built. A cost reduction might remove expertise we still need. And a development initiative might have very little connection to the priorities of the business.

The Trifecta brings the CEO, CFO, and Chief Human Success Officer into the same conversation. They need to understand the trade-offs together, rather than each optimizing their own part and hoping it adds up.

That’s what matters to me: people decisions should be made with the same care and business understanding as financial decisions.

Q: The idea of a Chief Human Success Officer is provocative. How is that role different from a traditional head of HR?

Changing the title doesn’t do much on its own. What matters is what you’re responsible for and what the business expects from you.

For me, the role means helping the business build the organization it needs to succeed. That includes capabilities, leadership, and how people work together. You need to understand the business well enough to challenge a decision, explain a trade-off, and take responsibility for your contribution.

The foundations of HR still need to work. But they can’t be the limit of the role.

And plenty of HR leaders already work this way. I wouldn’t dismiss that. The question is whether they have a clear mandate and whether the rest of the executive team treats them as a partner in running the business.

Q: So much of leadership today is measured by numbers. How do you help leaders put real metrics around something as human as engagement and growth?

I think we need to be more careful about what we count and what we conclude from it.

Someone completing a course tells us they completed a course. It doesn’t necessarily tell us they can do their job better. The same is true of check-ins. You can record a lot of conversations without knowing whether they helped.

The Human Success Score in the book brings learning, engagement, and performance into a connected view. But the real work is understanding how those things relate to the results you need.

I want data that helps us notice a problem, ask a better question, or decide where to invest. I also want us to be honest about its limits. A number can inform a conversation. It shouldn’t replace it.

Q: One line in the book stuck with us: “people want rules instead of tools.” What do you mean by that, and why does it matter for leaders right now?

I understand the wish for someone to tell you what to do. When there’s a lot of uncertainty, a clear set of instructions is reassuring.

But we’re working through a change that is still unfolding. There isn’t a finished case study for every decision we need to make.

The book uses the comparison between a map and a GPS. A map gives you a fixed picture. A GPS helps you adjust when the route changes.

For leaders, that means building the ability to assess a situation and change course. You still need boundaries and accountability, but you also need people who can think for themselves when the instructions no longer fit.

Q: In the story, the toughest critic turns out to be the catalyst for the CEO’s best work. What’s the lesson there for leaders facing pressure from a board or an investor?

It’s easy to get defensive when someone challenges your plan, especially if you disagree with how they do it.

But there may still be a valid question underneath. In the story, the board asks for a headcount reduction. The CEO has to work out what they actually want to achieve and whether there is a better way to get there.

He can’t just say their proposal is wrong. He needs to bring an alternative that stands up to scrutiny.

For me, that’s the lesson. Take the expectation seriously without assuming the proposed solution is the only one. A difficult challenge can make your thinking better, even when you don’t agree with the person making it.

Q: Who did you write this book for, and who do you think needs to read it most?

I’d love to see executive teams read it together.

A CEO, a CFO, and a people leader will probably recognize different parts of the story. They may disagree about where the problem is or what they would do next. That’s a useful conversation to have.

I also hope it resonates with HR leaders who want to contribute more directly to the business. You don’t have to become less interested in people to do that. You do need to understand what the business is trying to achieve and be able to explain how your work helps.

Q: What’s the one shift you’d want a leader to make on Monday morning after finishing the book?

I’d want them to pause before jumping to a solution.

If the starting question is “How do we do this faster?” or “How do we do it with fewer people?”, first ask what result you’re trying to improve and what is getting in the way.

Then speak to the people doing the work. They can often tell you where time is being lost, where decisions get stuck, and what they need to do a better job.

Choose one important outcome and look closely at the work around it. You don’t need to announce a transformation program on Monday morning. You need a clear problem and a sensible first step.

Q: What’s next for you, and where can readers find the book?

For me, it’s about continuing the conversation, particularly around what HR and leadership need to become in the age of AI.

I’ve been sharing the ideas at conferences, and I really enjoy hearing what people make of them. Sometimes they recognize their own situation. Sometimes they challenge something. Often they bring a question I haven’t considered.

I’m also bringing people together around this topic. There’s a lot we still need to work through, and I’d rather do that with people who are trying things in their own organizations than pretend we already have all the answers.

Readers can find out more and buy the book at zensai.com/book.

About the Author

Nina Carøe is Zensai’s Chief Human Success Officer, a role she pioneered to reflect the growing need for organizations to prioritize human growth, adaptability, and performance in an AI-driven world. She is a co-author, with Rasmus Holst (CEO of Zensai) and Robin Daniels, of The Human Success Playbook: A Leadership Tale for the Age of AI (Zensai Media, May 4, 2026). Visit zensai.com/book.